Promising
rewards for information significant for the capture of big time criminals is
not new. However, it does not happen all the time. The PNP rarely offers
rewards for information that can lead to the arrest of suspects, notorious or
otherwise. In few instances, the victims’ relatives also gamble away a huge
amount of money in exchange or vital information that can lead to the arrest of
suspects and the resolution of the crimes.
The
community is one of the pillars of the criminal justice system. Almost all
theories of law enforcement and penology point to the importance of public
participation in criminal investigation and prosecution. The preservation of
order and public peace serves as the primary goal of law enforcement. The
foundation and the ends of the criminal justice system lead to the people.
However, because of the continuing failure of the system to assure people of
fast and effective justice, public participation has given way to indifference
and apathy. These in turn lead to the loss of the civic consciousness of the
citizens.
Offering
reward to induce public participation in criminal investigations shows the weak
state of our law enforcement. It indicates the failure of the law enforcement
agencies to do their job of putting suspects behind bars. As stated, it
reflects the loss of the civic consciousness of the citizenry. Material incentives have replaced the spirit
of voluntarism which has been the foundation of sound public order.
Law
enforcement authorities usually release a “Most Wanted” poster disclosing the bounty
placed on the head of each suspect listed therein. Meanwhile, the National
Internal Revenue Code states the instances where rewards maybe claimed by
informers who tipped off the authorities about violations of the revenue code.
Since
rewards cannot be promised in all instances, they also reflect the unequal
treatment that government officials give to the cases pending before them. The
case of a beautiful and rich young lady who was killed by unidentified suspects
after her late night hang-out in Global City illustrates this point. The Las Pinas
government has offered a P500, 000.00 rewards for any information that can lead
to the identification and arrest of the suspects. Later, Malacanang raised the
bounty to P2.5 million. After the
authorities announced the P2.5 million rewards for anyone who could provide
information that may lead to the arrest of the suspects, somebody surrendered
to the NBI and admitted that he was one of those who abducted and stabbed the
victim.
Indeed,
money works in mysterious ways. In another instance, a P10 million reward was
offered by no less than the highest official of the Aquino administration for
the arrest of the suspected mastermind of the pork barrel scam. The ploy seemed
to work as the suspect surrendered to Malacanang officials immediately after
the announcement of the unusually big bounty. Her lawyer reasoned out that
people are out to kill or find her and surrendering to the President would
pre-empt bounty hunters from finding her. Hers is a special case of course. In
no other instance has any Philippine President offered money for information
and the arrest of a suspected criminal. This was first in Philippine history.
Public
moneys are usually used to pay informer’s rewards. Yet, not every victim is
given this special treatment. Many heinous crimes remain unresolved for many
years, if not for eternity, because they have not been given such special
treatment. They have become cold cases because no hot moneys were put into them
as bounties for their resolution. As in life, victims of heinous killings continue
to suffer even after death because of poverty. Their deaths do not make them
equal with others who lived and died in affluence. The institution of the
living is not capable of giving them the treatment they would have in the afterlife.
Yes, money works in mysterious ways. Unfortunately, it does work as such only
for those who have it in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment