Thursday, March 28, 2013

Ressurection


Resurrection

Post-modern thinkers would explain the recent phenomenon we have in the world today as: the deconstruction of the institutions and values. Its manifestations are seen everywhere. Religious and secular institutions are all afflicted with this new wave of cynicism. Questioning religious authority and teachings have been the agenda of the day for quite some time. Meanwhile, many people delight in the tirades against moral authorities.

Some hint that this phenomenon was brought by the failure of the institutions to reassert their relevance in the changing times. Times have changed. People expect that their institutions would change with them. But the reason is more than this assumed expectation. Truth is that many religious and social institutions have blend with the changes in the world but the waning of respect and the apathy of many continue. And despite the fact that the institutions have asserted themselves, the irrational attempts at their deconstructions have continued nonetheless. The postmodern times have produced deep sense of distrust and self-centeredness where religious authorities and values have become vulnerable targets and victims.
                                                                                                       
            The first original sin is not so much about eating the forbidden fruit or a mere defiance of moral authority. It is human being’s inordinate assertion of autonomy from the Creator—the false claim of existence away from the supreme authority of the Creator of Life. And so it is today. The attacks on religious authority is not a mere defiance of the moral values that they represent—the assaults, even in the assumption that they have been made in good faith and with best intentions—are attempts at living a life of absolute autonomy.

            However, human beings do not exist in isolation. No matter how claims for absolute autonomy take their toll against religions, beliefs in God and in the religious institutions would continue to reassert themselves because they represent the highest human existence—a life integrated with whole system of life support, i.e. family, community and the belief in the Creator. Religious values will continue to re-assert themselves for that is where they find their relevance in the changing times.

            The message of Resurrection is far stronger than any attempt to render the moral authority of religions irrelevant. Resurrection transcends all human institutions. As a concept, it is far more than rhetoric. In the physical plane, it represents hope in times of great distress. People of goodwill, the new life springing in the natural environment, the rising sun—these are the physical manifestations of resurrection. Spiritually, it is the core of the Christian belief. Jesus Christ rises up with the message of salvation for humankind. His sacrifices have meaning because He had risen up from the dead. People who believe in him cannot perish even if their bodies would be mutilated and burned to ashes. Resurrection keeps people fighting for a just world.

            This is what the world needs today. Belief in the resurrection gives people reason to resist all temptations to squander the gift of life and the delusions of complete autonomy from the teaching of religious faiths. People need to see resurrection as the summit of human civilizations. Without faith in resurrection belief in the survival of human civilization can easily be dampened by the post-modern culture of deconstruction and distrust.

There is nothing more beautiful than this: the self-giving sacrifice of a Man who laid down His life so that everyone shall live in abundance of the Kingdom of God. Happy Easter!

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Not Necessrily the News


Not Necessarily the News

How would you distinguish entertainment from news?

How do media practitioners determine which events of the day are newsworthy and which are simply entertainments--and thus have no significance to the political and social life of the nation?

Setting a parameter is extremely difficult, if not impossible. News agencies, like entertainment outfits, rely heavily on the patronage of the audience. Surveys have been used to determine how listeners and viewers calibrate the credibility and popularity of television and radio networks. With these as determinants of their seeming credibility and popularity, networks have to work with vast pressures to deliver the “news of the day” in a very entertaining manner. The contents may refer to matters of national or local significance, but the mode of their delivery should cater to the sway of the opinions of the listening and viewing public. TINA. There is no alternative if the news program has to stay on the air and be able to compete with other programs.

However, news could not be delivered merely to entertain people. Neither is its primary objective to inform the public. Its primary objective is the formation of public opinion—to serve as a springboard of public discourse on matter of political, social, cultural and economic importance. Anything below this purpose maybe considered merely consequential, if not truly insignificant.

This is the job of news agencies. They are bound to deliver information to help the formation of public opinions. Their relevance in an ideal society cannot be discounted—democracy depends upon the level, nature and vigor of public discussion. Without them, people would likely be deprived of information vital to their personal and social lives. Mediocrity, not democracy, will prevail if they are not free to do the work entrusted to them by the society.

What news struck public attention in the recent past? Of course, survey may validate any wild guess but validation or verification is in itself problematic. How does one determine whether the news of the day is significant, let’s say, to the political life of the nation?

Take for instance the President who had been ascribed as one with the lowest trust rating in the Philippine history. She was unpopular. Nobody takes her seriously when she talks about government reforms. She could not inspire change as she represents what others considered as the black side of the force. Yet, when she speaks, her words are news—regardless of whether one would later find her ridiculous or lying to her teeth. Why is this? This is so because despite the stigma that was casted upon her name, she used to set the national agenda—the agenda of the day. And what she had said before were news nonetheless.
                                                                                                        
That is what the news should do—set the agenda of the day and provide the springboard for public discourse. This separates entertainment from news of the day. Entertainment could not provide any agenda for the nation—as such, television and radio networks should treat them politically and socially insignificant. They are gossips! And despite the hearsay nature of most news articles, they could not be relegated to mere gossips. They are politically and socially significant. They are source of healthy, and even violent, public discourses. They are news not trivialities!

So, do you know now why the recent “media events” are not necessarily the news of the day? Ponder on this.  

Saturday, March 16, 2013

The Bar Examinations


The Bar Examinations

Around a thousand barristers are expected to join the Integrated Bar every year. The results of the Bar examinations are always much-awaited—exciting to almost everyone but somehow dreadful to those who suffer sleepless nights while waiting for the announcement of the Supreme Court.

What makes the Bar examinations popular is open to many speculations. All guesses are either far fetch or accurate. Admiration and fear are the two emotions that afflict those who behold them. The Bar exams are always fascinating and mysterious to the observers. On the other hand, there is always a gnawing fear in the mind of those who had taken them—the exams may result in one’s greatest affirmation or failure!

 The examinations cover eight courses: Political Law and International Law, Labor and Soial Legislation, Civil Law, Taxation, Commercial Law, Criminal Law, Remedial Law and Legal Ethics which includes pratical exercises in forms and legal skills. They are spread out in the four sundays of the Bar month, which is used to be in September until the Supreme Court decided to transfer it to November, and just recently to October. The policy, which is at times not adhered to by the Supreme Court, speaks of disqualification grade of 50% and a requirement of a general percentile average (GPA) of 75%. Anyone who fails to beat these qualifications flunks the Bar unless the Supreme Court waives the policy for a particular Bar year.
            Essay questions used to dominate the Bar Examinations until the Supreme Court adopted the multiple choice (MCQ) exams in 2011. The Supreme Court redefined the coverage of the exams by mandating that their coverage shall be drawn up by topics and subtopics rather than by just stating the covered law. Another innovation is the attempt to measure the knowledge of law and its applications through the MCQ exams. Meanwhile, essay questions are still provided to test the lawyering skills of the bar candidates.
            Taking the Bar exams is psychological torture for most examinees. The uncertainties accompanying the examinations and those that afflict barristers while waiting for the results are beyond description. Many experience nightmares while a few others have to confront their anxieties and depressions as early as the last day of the exams. Well, some are lucky to be pre-occupied with other things—they do not have the luxury of time to delve into the possibilities of the Supreme Court’s final imprimatur on the Bar exams results.
             Of course the preparation for the Bar starts on the first day of the first year class in law school. Everything starts from the law school. The six months review serves merely as the winding up process for four to five years wrestling bouts with the law professors. Students are told to prepare for the Bar exams during the first day of their class. Despite these warnings, students still get to enjoy the wild side of the law school before they finally face the test of fire. The Bar examinations serve as the standard that law students have to measure up with. Thus, passing the Bar exams is always a source of profound joy and the proof of the indomitable spirit that one has earned during those difficult years in law school.